exit (3p) - Linux Manuals
exit: terminate a process
PROLOG
This manual page is part of the POSIX Programmer's Manual. The Linux implementation of this interface may differ (consult the corresponding Linux manual page for details of Linux behavior), or the interface may not be implemented on Linux.NAME
exit, _Exit, _exit - terminate a process
SYNOPSIS
#include <stdlib.h>
void exit(int status);
void _Exit(int status);
#include <unistd.h>
void _exit(int status);
DESCRIPTION
For exit() and _Exit(): The functionality described on this reference page is aligned with the ISO C standard. Any conflict between the requirements described here and the ISO C standard is unintentional. This volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 defers to the ISO C standard.
The value of status may be 0, EXIT_SUCCESS, EXIT_FAILURE,
The exit() function shall first call all functions registered
by atexit(),
in the reverse order of their registration, except that a function
is called after any previously registered functions that had
already been called at the time it was registered. Each function is
called as many times as it was registered. If, during the call
to any such function, a call to the longjmp() function is made
that would terminate
the call to the registered function, the behavior is undefined.
If a function registered by a call to atexit() fails to return,
the remaining
registered functions shall not be called and the rest of the exit()
processing shall not be completed. If exit() is
called more than once, the behavior is undefined.
The exit() function shall then flush all open streams with unwritten
buffered data, close all open streams, and remove
all files created by tmpfile(). Finally, control shall be terminated
with the
consequences described below.
The
_Exit() and _exit() functions shall be functionally equivalent.
The _Exit() and _exit() functions
shall not call functions registered with atexit() nor any registered
signal handlers.
Whether open streams are flushed or closed, or temporary files are
removed is implementation-defined. Finally, the calling process
is terminated with the consequences described below.
These functions shall terminate the calling process with the following
consequences:
The semantics of the waitid() function shall be equivalent to
wait().
The semantics of the waitid() function shall be equivalent to
wait().
If the implementation supports the SIGCHLD signal, a SIGCHLD shall
be sent to the parent process.
Or:
If the parent process has set its SA_NOCLDWAIT flag, or set SIGCHLD
to SIG_IGN, the status shall be discarded, and the lifetime of
the calling process shall end immediately. If SA_NOCLDWAIT is set,
it is implementation-defined whether a SIGCHLD signal is sent to
the parent process.
These functions do not return.
No errors are defined.
The following sections are informative.
Normally applications should use exit() rather than _Exit()
or _exit().
Early proposals drew a distinction between normal and abnormal process
termination. Abnormal termination was caused only by
certain signals and resulted in implementation-defined "actions",
as discussed below. Subsequent proposals distinguished three
types of termination: normal termination (as in the current
specification), simple abnormal termination, and
abnormal termination with actions. Again the distinction between
the two types of abnormal termination was that they were
caused by different signals and that implementation-defined actions
would result in the latter case. Given that these actions were
completely implementation-defined, the early proposals were only saying
when the actions could occur and how their occurrence could
be detected, but not what they were. This was of little or no use
to conforming applications, and thus the distinction is not made
in this volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001.
The implementation-defined actions usually include, in most historical
implementations, the creation of a file named core
in the current working directory of the process. This file contains
an image of the memory of the process, together with
descriptive information about the process, perhaps sufficient to reconstruct
the state of the process at the receipt of the
signal.
There is a potential security problem in creating a core file
if the process was set-user-ID and the current user is not
the owner of the program, if the process was set-group-ID and none
of the user's groups match the group of the program, or if the
user does not have permission to write in the current directory. In
this situation, an implementation either should not create a
core file or should make it unreadable by the user.
Despite the silence of this volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 on this
feature, applications are advised not to create
files named core because of potential conflicts in many implementations.
Some implementations use a name other than
core for the file; for example, by appending the process ID
to the filename.
It is important that the consequences of process termination as described
occur regardless of whether the process called
_exit() (perhaps indirectly through exit()) or instead
was terminated due to a signal or for some other reason. Note
that in the specific case of exit() this means that the status
argument to exit() is treated in the same way
as the status argument to _exit().
A language other than C may have other termination primitives than
the C-language exit() function, and programs written
in such a language should use its native termination primitives, but
those should have as part of their function the behavior of
_exit() as described. Implementations in languages other than
C are outside the scope of this version of this volume of
IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, however.
As required by the ISO C standard, using return from main()
has the same behavior (other than with respect to
language scope issues) as calling exit() with the returned value.
Reaching the end of the main() function has the
same behavior as calling exit(0).
A value of zero (or EXIT_SUCCESS, which is required to be zero) for
the argument status conventionally indicates
successful termination. This corresponds to the specification for
exit() in the ISO C standard. The convention is
followed by utilities such as make and various shells, which
interpret a zero status
from a child process as success. For this reason, applications should
not call exit(0) or _exit(0) when they
terminate unsuccessfully; for example, in signal-catching functions.
Historically, the implementation-defined process that inherits children
whose parents have terminated without waiting on them is
called init and has a process ID of 1.
The sending of a SIGHUP to the foreground process group when a controlling
process terminates corresponds to somewhat different
historical implementations. In System V, the kernel sends a SIGHUP
on termination of (essentially) a controlling process. In 4.2
BSD, the kernel does not send SIGHUP in a case like this, but the
termination of a controlling process is usually noticed by a
system daemon, which arranges to send a SIGHUP to the foreground process
group with the vhangup() function. However, in 4.2
BSD, due to the behavior of the shells that support job control, the
controlling process is usually a shell with no other processes
in its process group. Thus, a change to make _exit() behave
this way in such systems should not cause problems with existing
applications.
The termination of a process may cause a process group to become orphaned
in either of two ways. The connection of a process
group to its parent(s) outside of the group depends on both the parents
and their children. Thus, a process group may be orphaned
by the termination of the last connecting parent process outside of
the group or by the termination of the last direct descendant
of the parent process(es). In either case, if the termination of a
process causes a process group to become orphaned, processes
within the group are disconnected from their job control shell, which
no longer has any information on the existence of the process
group. Stopped processes within the group would languish forever.
In order to avoid this problem, newly orphaned process groups
that contain stopped processes are sent a SIGHUP signal and a SIGCONT
signal to indicate that they have been disconnected from
their session. The SIGHUP signal causes the process group members
to terminate unless they are catching or ignoring SIGHUP. Under
most circumstances, all of the members of the process group are stopped
if any of them are stopped.
The action of sending a SIGHUP and a SIGCONT signal to members of
a newly orphaned process group is similar to the action of 4.2
BSD, which sends SIGHUP and SIGCONT to each stopped child of an exiting
process. If such children exit in response to the SIGHUP,
any additional descendants receive similar treatment at that time.
In this volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, the signals
are sent to the entire process group at the same time. Also, in this
volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, but not in 4.2 BSD,
stopped processes may be orphaned, but may be members of a process
group that is not orphaned; therefore, the action taken at
_exit() must consider processes other than child processes.
It is possible for a process group to be orphaned by a call to setpgid()
or setsid(), as well as by process termination. This volume
of
IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 does not require sending SIGHUP and SIGCONT
in those cases, because, unlike process termination,
those cases are not caused accidentally by applications that are unaware
of job control. An implementation can choose to send
SIGHUP and SIGCONT in those cases as an extension; such an extension
must be documented as required in <signal.h>.
The ISO/IEC 9899:1999 standard adds the _Exit() function that
results in immediate program termination without
triggering signals or atexit()-registered functions. In
IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, this is equivalent to the _exit() function.
atexit(), close(), fclose(),
longjmp(), posix_trace_shutdown(), posix_trace_trid_eventid_open(),
semop(), shmget(), sigaction(), wait()
,
waitid(), waitpid(), the Base Definitions volume of
IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, <stdlib.h>, <unistd.h>
RETURN VALUE
ERRORS
EXAMPLES
APPLICATION USAGE
RATIONALE
Process Termination
Terminating a Process
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
COPYRIGHT
Portions of this text are reprinted and reproduced in electronic form
from IEEE Std 1003.1, 2003 Edition, Standard for Information Technology
-- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX), The Open Group Base
Specifications Issue 6, Copyright (C) 2001-2003 by the Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and The Open Group. In the
event of any discrepancy between this version and the original IEEE and
The Open Group Standard, the original IEEE and The Open Group Standard
is the referee document. The original Standard can be obtained online at
http://www.opengroup.org/unix/online.html .
SEE ALSO