sbcl (1) - Linux Manuals
sbcl: Steel Bank Common Lisp
NAME
SBCL -- Steel Bank Common Lisp
DESCRIPTION
SBCL is an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp, featuring a high-performance native compiler, native threads on several platforms, a socket interface, a source-level debugger, a statistical profiler, and much more.
It is free software, mostly in the public domain, but with some subsystems under BSD-style licenses which allow modification and reuse as long as credit is given. It is provided "as is", with no warranty of any kind.
For more information about license issues, see the COPYING file in the distribution. For more information about history, see the CREDITS file in the distribution.
RUNNING SBCL
To run SBCL, type "sbcl". After startup messages a prompt ("*") appears. Enter a Lisp expression, and SBCL will read and execute it, print any values returned, give you another prompt, and wait for your next input.
Most people like to run SBCL as a subprocess under Emacs. The Emacs
"Slime" mode provides many convenient features, like command line
editing, tab completion, and various kinds of coupling between Common
Lisp source files and the interactive SBCL subprocess.
For information on creating "standalone executables" using SBCL, see
SB-EXT:SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE in the User Manual.
For ordinary interactive use, no command line arguments should be
necessary.
In order to understand the SBCL command line syntax, it is helpful to
understand that the system is composed of two parts: a runtime
environment, and the Common Lisp system it supports. Some command line
arguments are processed during the initialization of the runtime, and
some during the initialization of the Lisp system -- any remaining
command line arguments are passed on to user code.
The overall command line syntax is:
Both --end-runtime-options and --end-toplevel-options are
optional, and may be omitted. They are intended for use in situations
where any command line options are under user control (e.g. in batch
files): by using them you can prevent options intended for your
program being accidentally processed by SBCL.
Supported runtime options are
In the future, runtime options may be added to control behavior such
as lazy allocation of memory.
Runtime options, including any --end-runtime-options option,
are stripped out of the command line before the
Lisp toplevel logic gets a chance to see it.
The toplevel options supported by the standard SBCL core are
Causes the system to load the specified file and exit immediately
afterwards, instead of entering the read-eval-print loop. If the file
begins with a shebang line, it is ignored.
Regardless of the order in which toplevel options appear on the command
line, the order of actions is:
Finally, either the read-eval-print loop is entered or the file
specified with --script option is loaded.
When running in the read-eval-print loop the system exits on end of
file. Similarly, the system exits immediately after processing the
file specified with --script.
Note that when running SBCL with the --core option, using a core
file created by a user call to the
SB-EXT:SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE, the toplevel options may be
under the control of user code passed as arguments to
SB-EXT:SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE. For this purpose, the
--end-toplevel-options option itself can be considered a toplevel
option, i.e. the user core, at its option, may not support it.
In the standard SBCL startup sequence (i.e. with no user core
involved) toplevel options and any --end-toplevel-options option are
stripped out of the command line argument list before user code gets a
chance to see it.
SBCL is derived from the CMU CL. (The name is intended to acknowledge
the connection: steel and banking are the industries where Carnegie
and Mellon made the big bucks.)
SBCL compiles by default: even functions entered in the
read-eval-print loop are compiled to native code, unless the evaluator
has been explicitly turned on. (Even today, some 40 years after the
MacLisp compiler, people will tell you that Lisp is an interpreted
language. Ignore them.)
SBCL aims for but has not completely achieved compliance with the ANSI
standard for Common Lisp. More information about this is available in
the BUGS section below.
SBCL also includes various non-ANSI extensions, described more fully
in the User Manual. Some of these are in the base system and others
are "contrib" modules loaded on request using REQUIRE. For
example, to load the SB-BSD-SOCKETS module that provides
TCP/IP connectivity,
For more information, see the User Manual.
SBCL inherits from CMU CL the "Python" native code compiler. (Though
we often avoid that name in order to avoid confusion with the
scripting language also called Python.) This compiler is very clever
about understanding the type system of Common Lisp and using it to
optimize code, and about producing notes to let the user know when the
compiler doesn't have enough type information to produce efficient
code. It also tries (almost always successfully) to follow the unusual
but very useful principle that "declarations are assertions", i.e.
type declarations should be checked at runtime unless the user
explicitly tells the system that speed is more important than safety.
The compiled code uses garbage collection to automatically manage
memory. The garbage collector implementation varies considerably from
CPU to CPU. In particular, on some CPUs the GC is nearly exact, while
on others it's more conservative, and on some CPUs the GC is
generational, while on others simpler stop and copy strategies are
used.
For more information about the compiler, see the user manual.
SBCL currently runs on X86 (Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD),
X86-64 (Linux), Alpha (Linux, Tru64), PPC (Linux, Darwin/MacOS X),
SPARC (Linux and Solaris 2.x), and MIPS (Linux). For information on
other ongoing and possible ports, see the sbcl-devel mailing list,
and/or the web site.
SBCL requires on the order of 16Mb RAM to run on X86 systems, though
all but the smallest programs would be happier with 32Mb or more.
This section attempts to list the most serious and long-standing bugs.
For more detailed and current information on bugs, see the BUGS file
in the distribution.
It is possible to get in deep trouble by exhausting heap memory. The
SBCL system overcommits memory at startup, so, on typical Unix-alikes
like Linux and FreeBSD, this means that if the SBCL system turns out
to use more virtual memory than the system has available for it, other
processes tend to be killed randomly (!).
The compiler's handling of function return values unnecessarily
violates the "declarations are assertions" principle that it otherwise
adheres to. Using PROCLAIM or DECLAIM to specify the
return type of a function causes the compiler to believe you without
checking. Thus compiling a file containing
Some things are implemented very inefficiently.
To report a bug, please send mail to the mailing lists sbcl-help or
sbcl-devel. You can find the complete mailing list addresses on the
web pages at <http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/>; note that as a
spam reduction measure you must subscribe to the lists before you can
post. (You may also find fancy SourceForge bug-tracking machinery
there, but don't be fooled. As of 2002-07-25 anyway, we don't actively
monitor that machinery, and it exists only because we haven't been
able to figure out how to turn it off.)
As with any software bug report, it's most helpful if you can provide
enough information to reproduce the symptoms reliably, and if you say
clearly what the symptoms are. For example, "There seems to be
something wrong with TAN of very small negative arguments. When I
execute (TAN LEAST-NEGATIVE-SINGLE-FLOAT) interactively on
sbcl-1.2.3 on my Linux 4.5 X86 box, I get an UNBOUND-VARIABLE
error."
SBCL can be built from scratch using a plain vanilla ANSI Common Lisp
system and a C compiler, and all of its properties are specified by
the version of the source code that it was created from. This clean
bootstrappability was the immediate motivation for forking off of the
CMU CL development tree. A variety of implementation differences are
motivated by this design goal.
Maintenance work in SBCL since the fork has diverged somewhat from the
maintenance work in CMU CL. Many but not all bug fixes and
improvements have been shared between the two projects, and sometimes
the two projects disagree about what would be an improvement.
Most extensions supported by CMU CL have been unbundled from SBCL,
including Motif support, the Hemlock editor, search paths, the WIRE
protocol, various user-level macros and functions (e.g.
LETF, ITERATE, MEMQ, REQUIRED-ARGUMENT),
and many others.
(Why doesn't SBCL support more extensions natively? Why drop all those
nice extensions from CMU CL when the code already exists? This is a
frequently asked question on the mailing list. There are two principal
reasons. First, it's a design philosophy issue: arguably SBCL has done
its job by supplying a stable FFI, and the right design decision is to
move functionality derived from that, like socket support, into
separate libraries. Some of these are distributed with SBCL as
"contrib" modules, others are distributed as separate software
packages by separate maintainers. Second, it's a practical decision -
focusing on a smaller number of things will, we hope, let us do a
better job on them.)
Various information about SBCL is available at
<http://www.sbcl.org/>. The mailing lists there are the recommended
place to look for support.
Dozens of people have made substantial contributions to SBCL and its
subsystems, and to the CMU CL system on which it was based, over the
years. See the CREDITS file in the distribution for more information.
Full SBCL documentation is maintained as a Texinfo manual. If is has
been installed, the command
should give you access to the complete manual. Depending on your
installation it may also be available in HTML and PDF formats in e.g.
See the SBCL homepage
for more information, including directions on how to subscribe to the
sbcl-devel and sbcl-help mailing-lists.
COMMAND LINE SYNTAX
OVERVIEW
*
* THE COMPILER
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
KNOWN BUGS
then running (FOO 1) gives NOT-THIS-TIME, because
the compiler relied on the truth of the DECLAIM without checking it.
REPORTING BUGS
DIFFERENCES FROM CMU CL
SUPPORT
AUTHORS
ENVIRONMENT
FILES
SEE ALSO